我写了篇tpo4的综合写作。。不知道到底怎么样啊啊啊！！！！求喷！！！！！

发布网友 发布时间：2022-05-07 19:55

我来回答

共1个回答

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！

热心网友 时间：2023-11-08 16:27

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some foods are considered to be of super power which could serve to benefit humans, while the listening passage casts doubts on some of the functions of "super-power food".

First of all, the professor makes the point that the relationship between adding blueberries in diet and brain function might be misleading. According to the professor, the researches concted before only tested mice and rates, which do not guarantee that vary same function will happen to humans. This clearly contradicts the reading material that blueberries have a positive effect on brain functions.

In addition, another important point made in the listening passage is that there is no direct proof to show tomatoes and broccoli can rece people's cancer risk. However, the reading passage presents a conflicting idea that these kinds of food can rece the chance of getting certain kinds of cancer. As stated by the professor, the above assumption is not clarified by scientific study, so the reading passage's claim is immature at best.

Finally, by citing a recent research, the professor states that garlic's function in lowering blood cholesterol is bious. Based on a research, garlic's function in lowering cholesterol remains effective only in three months, and after that its function is unstable. This challenges the standpoint of the reading material's author, who demonstrates that there is good reason to praise garlic's special function.

Being challenged from all the major respects asserted in the reading material, the content of the reading material is totally jeopardized by the lecturer, who deems it not only poorly designed but also unscientific as well.

这是我的综合写作思路，楼主可以对照一下！