英语演讲孔子苏格拉底25
发布网友
发布时间：2023-11-08 15:33
共2个回答
热心网友
时间：2024-12-02 11:19
In ancient times, there are two great ecator. One was Confucius in China. The other was Socrates in Greece. They are still be praised in the world today. So, nowadays we discuss the topic " when Socrates meets confucius ". Of course, in the real world, there is no chance that they encounter with each other. However, there is a field of consciousness where they can exchange ideas through modern communications in the whole world. Because their thoughts are still having a profound impact on modern people.
Not only did they advocated benevolence and goodness, but also they paid attention to humanism and concerned about people and society.
Firstly, i imagine that they would become good friends and live in harmony with each other when Socrates meets Confucius. These are also entirely reflected from modern people
communication activities such as Olympic, Copenhagen conference and so on. For example, we are committed to peace and opposed to the war. In addition, our communications become more and more frequently in political, economical and cultural aspects, especially in Expo. Besides, many of the students choose to study abroad in order to exchange ideas. Thus, there is a peaceful exchange between friends when Socrates meets Confucius.
Secondly, because they advocated benevolence and goodness. I imagine that they would help each other when they would have suffered from difficulties. It is reflected from countries in the world. When a country encounters with a major disaster, the other countries will extend a helping hand. For example, an earthquake had struck Sichuan in china. Then, many countries also sent supplies to help deal with some problems.
Thirdly, on the one hand, they had these ideas in common. On the other hand, they had the different emphases. Confucius laid emphasis on human ethics, adjusting the relationship between people. He paid attention to the social nature of people. However, Socratesadvocated human freedom. Not only did he lay emphasis on human, but also he against God. He focused on the human personality. For instance, Although gay marriage can not be legally recognized in china today. In the us, they are not only able to receive a marriage certificate, but also they can adopt a child, which is e to that they focus on personality. Thus, they do not scruple on pursuing something.
All in all, when Socrates meets Confucius, it is not only a feast of ideas exchanged, but also it is a cultural collision.
我随便给你大概译了一下作为参考
当苏格拉底遇见孔子
在古代,有两个伟大的教育家。一个是孔子在中国。另一个是在希腊的苏格拉底。他们仍然是当今世界的圣人。所以,现在我们讨论这个话题“当苏格拉底遇见孔子”。当然,在现实世界,他们没有机会遇到对方。然而,有一个领域的意识,在那里他们可以交流想法通过现代通信在整个世界。因为他们的思想仍有深刻影响的现代人。
他们不仅提倡仁和美好,但也注重人文关怀和关心人与社会。
首先,我想,他们会成为好朋友,苏格拉底会和孔子彼此和谐相处。这些也完全体现在现代的人
交流活动,如奥运会,哥本哈根会议等等。例如,我们致力于和平,反对战争。此外,我们的交流变得越来越频繁地在*、经济和文化方面,尤其是在世博会。此外,许多学生选择出国留学为了交流思想。因此,当苏格拉底遇见孔子，他们有一种朋友之间的和平交流。
其次,因为他们主张仁和善良。我想象他们会互相帮助当他们将遭受困难。这在世界各个国家都体现出来。当一个国家遇到重大灾难,其他国家将会伸出援助之手。例如,地震袭击了四川在中国。然后,许多国家还送物资,帮助处理一些问题。
第三,一方面,他们有这些想法的共同点。另一方面,他们有不同的侧重点。孔子强调人类伦理、调整人们之间的关系。他注意到社会性质的人。然而,苏格拉底提倡人类自由。他不仅强调人类,但他也反对神。他关注人类的个性。例如,尽管同性婚姻不能在今天的中国法律认可。在美国,他们不仅能够得到一个结婚证书,同时他们也可以领养一个孩子,这是由于他们专注于人格。因此,他们不顾忌的追求上。
总之,当苏格拉底遇见孔子,它不仅是一种思想的盛宴,也是完成了一种文化交流。
请采纳，祝好！
热心网友
时间：2024-12-02 11:19
When Socrates Meets Confucius
As is known to all, there were two sages around the same time who were comparable to each other. One was Confucius, in China, and the other was the ancient Greek thinker, Socrates, whom, up to now, are still praised by the whole world. They both had philosophies that stood out among human beings and both had great influence on us and continue to have that influence. They are not only great philosophers, but also maestros in many fields, especially the area of ecation.
Though they lived in almost the same time, they were from two completely separate parts of the world. But still, as the saying goes, great minds think alike. These two maestros had a lot in common when it comes to ecation. Does it ever occur to you what kind of sparks would have been created if they had met each other?
In the respect of teaching subjects, they were both well aware that there was no such thing as a distinction between classes or races of people, which made civilization and ecation universal to a great extent. I dare say they would have fully supported each other in this point of view.
And they would be of one mind when it comes to the function of ecation. Both of them attach great importance to acquired ecation and consider the purpose of ecation to be a form of nurture for people to gain political integrity and professional competence.
In regards to their teaching methods, these two mentors both paid attention to developing the students’ thinking ability through inspirational teaching ways, called heuristic teaching, or elicitation method. They saw eye to eye in this viewpoint, a viewpoint that has an enormous impact on modern ecation.
Because of the differences between their two political systems and social environments, they also disagreed with each other on many perspectives, but, regardless, I think these two maestros would work it out.
Thank you for taking your time.
